The world of Hollywood has a long history of setting, and often simultaneously ruining, our expectations for future technologies. Particularly, I’ve noticed a trend when it comes to smart glasses. Consider the recent example of Netflix’s Un homme de l'int\u00e9rieur<\/em>, une s\u00e9rie qui met involontairement en lumi\u00e8re une facette sombre de cette technologie que beaucoup ont tendance \u00e0 n\u00e9gliger.<\/p>\n In the show, there’s an intriguing character, Charles Nieuwendyk, masterfully played by Ted Danson. He embodies the trope of an elderly widower who stumbles upon a new, thrilling purpose in life. Nieuwendyk leverages his senior status to secure a position for a private investigator, putting a unique twist on the traditional undercover agent scenario. To aid his spying endeavors, he uses a toolkit consisting of Ray-Ban Meta-like glasses, a voice recorder and a smartphone.<\/p>\n Now, this is where things get rather dicey. He is assigned to infiltrate a retirement home and what follows are several incidents where privacy comes into question. His glasses, being smart wearables, enable him to embark on missions laden with surveillance and invasion of personal spaces. As the episodes roll out, you can’t help but cringe – the privacy-infringing hijinks don’t feel so entertaining anymore.<\/p>\n Ironically, the plot brings to the fore, one of the biggest cultural issues related to emerging technologies like smart glasses. We’re knee-deep in a digital era where such devices are increasingly seen as the future. But do we stop to ponder what they mean when it comes to personal privacy? Are we ready to open up our lives to such an extent?<\/p>\n Smart glasses that allow capturing photos and videos, play music, answer calls, read texts and more are no longer just a fantasy. They’re here, with tech giants like Google and Meta taking the lead in shaping this reality. However, there is a serious and inherent threat of surveillance, privacy breach, and data security. Will wearing these ubiquitous smart glasses turn us all into potential spies?<\/p>\n De plus, quel sera leur impact sur notre entourage ? Comment me sentirais-je si je devais interagir avec quelqu\u2019un portant des lunettes connect\u00e9es dot\u00e9es d\u2019une fonction d\u2019enregistrement ? Pourrais-je m\u2019exprimer librement ? Aurais-je suffisamment confiance en cette personne ?<\/p>\n The questions are endless and the concerns are legitimate, and it’s high time we turn our attention to them. Smart glasses, like any technology, have the potential to be a force for good. But design and usage guidelines need to be defined to prevent them from being misused.<\/p>\n As I pondered over these aspects, I realized that while I was just watching a show and doing my job, it felt disconcerting to witness the blatant disregard for personal privacy. Technology should be a tool that empowers us, not one that leaves us vulnerable and constantly on guard. It’s a delicate balance that we need to strike – between embracing innovations and safeguarding our privacy.<\/p>\nEst-ce que \u00e7a va trop loin ?<\/h2>\n